For those that have used these rests, what are your opinions?
I want a full capture dropaway rest for my Firecat, and my current Trophy Taker dropaway will be going on my Jaguar.
A.S
Printable View
For those that have used these rests, what are your opinions?
I want a full capture dropaway rest for my Firecat, and my current Trophy Taker dropaway will be going on my Jaguar.
A.S
I have a Smackdown, as well as several older TT full containment rests. I personally prefer the older style that attached to the down cable. The new style seems to be a little bit louder, as well as harder to set-up. I also have a NAP Apache, though not the carbon version. I think it's pretty much a toss up between the two, with the NAP being quite a bit cheaper, but every bit as good. It's also lighter. Getting ready to try out a QAD if my new bow ever shows up. lol
Love the carbon apache on my pantera. Got it cheap offa eblay. Light and quiet and the side load is easier.Was easy to set up. No experience with TT.
I have no experience with NAP. I do love all my TT Products. I have the Smackdown that connect to the lower limbs. it's so easy to adjust...even a Double S can do it.! It's that simple. lol.
I just switched from a QAD HDX to a TT Smackdown FC...I really thought the QADs where quiet, and have nothing bad to say about QAD, but I didn't know what silence was until I installed a TT Smackdown on my carbon matrix...I don't have any experience with the NAP
I am not familiar with the Smackdown, but some with the standard Trophy Takers and all have been good.
The NAP Apache I do have experience as in I can't keep one for myself. Sold I don't know how many. When I get another I'm hiding it. Easy to set up, full containment, arrow will pick up where ever arrow is inside the cage. I have used the Apache on my target bows and had excellent results.
Thanks for everyone's input. I ended up getting a regular NAP Apache, and I totally like it.:cool::cool: It's a very impressive rest.
A.S