large cutting diameter (fixed blade) vs. vanes - g5 striker (magnum)
i guess the striker magnum will not fly like a field point, but does the larger cutting diameter implicate larger/ higher vanes as well??
i thought of trying the striker with its 1,5'' cutting diameter, but im using mini blazers (1,5'' length; profile height of .49") and the head would be much higher than the vanes. could this negatively affect arrow flight?
large cutting diameter (fixed blade) vs. vanes - g5 striker (magnum)
Actually, the Mini Blazer is recommended for 3D. Bow tuned and fixed heads should fly pretty descent, but then all fixed broadheads are not created equal.
I have tried the 2.2 Arizona vane and it did just fine...with field points, so I see no reason why it shouldn't work for fixed bhs. I'd fletch it no more than 3 degrees. Bow tuned well and there is no need for full helical (most 2" hunting vanes aren't recommended for more than 3 degrees - Bohning states so and the instructions (diagram) for NAP's Twisters show max of 3 degrees.
My old 2000 Hoyt MagnaTec is tuned, I guess. I've slapped just about every fixed broad on my arrow and have stayed on target out to 40 yards, 100 grs to 123 grs.
Thought about retiring the ole Hoyt, even bought a new bow to replace it back in 2009, a Pearson TX4. The TX proved darned fast, but then I never even set it up accept to test for speed - just hangs on the rack. Lazy me or the MagnaTec is good enough.