Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Teflon sliders verses Cable rollers

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    99
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default Teflon sliders verses Cable rollers

    Please could someone explain the pros & cons of each device, thanks.
    Testing testing

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    179
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    rollers are amazing and can speed up ur bow and the slider can stick to the rod but the cann increass draw weighti dont really know much about the sliders

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Iowa
    Posts
    390
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    slider, pros. adjustable, mostly. simple easy to replace. they work well.
    rollers. generally not adjustable. mostly work, havent heard of a ccs malfunction for quite awhile. potentially can cause a little extra limb twist, because of excessive clearance. ccs make the draw cycle smoother though (idk for sure, never shot the same bow at the same weight with just the cable guide system swapped) thats about all i got. slide is cheaper....
    2010 rytera x. apache rest, truglo 5pin. 8in shockbocker 1000 stabilizer. norway g2 string tamer Huch-n-Son strings
    2010 rytera z apache carbon rest axt primal x5 sight

  4. #4
    Senior Member gravedigger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    forest grove,oregon
    Posts
    3,761
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    i had a rod and slide and i now have the ccs.the ccs will increase your draw weight by 3-5 lbs,may cause some cam lean/limb twist but it is a ez fix,smoother draw IMO,great clearance.with the slide i thought the draw was nice till i got a ccs.now i think it is a bit rough with a slide.slide is way way cheaper and very afective,dont like the way the slide looks.ccs just brings the bow togther.

  5. #5
    Senior Member bowgramp59's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    vernon texas
    Posts
    507
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    no comparison in my book ccs is a much better system than the slide. but i have both, the slide system has been around for a long time i guess it will be around for a long time to come.
    curtis

    2010 nemesis camo, 2011 nemesis carbon fiber,
    2010 onza 3 camo,

  6. #6
    Senior Member elkslayer4x5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Lane County, Oregon
    Posts
    2,934
    Post Thanks / Like

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bowgramp59 View Post
    no comparison in my book ccs is a much better system than the slide. but i have both, the slide system has been around for a long time i guess it will be around for a long time to come.
    Apparently for a while longer as Martin brought back the old tried and true cable slide to replace that TRG system that did'nt work out so well.
    http://eastoutfitter.tripod.com/index.html
    http://www.cascadianbowmen.org/
    Martin 06 Slayer, Nitrous C, shoot thru, 63lb, Quiktune 3000, HAA OL 5519, Beman ICS Hunter
    Martin 06 Slayer, Nitrous C, Shoot thru, 55lb, Quiktune 3000, HHA OL 5519 2X, Easton A/C/C
    Ben Pearson 1968 'Cougar' 62" 45#s @ 28" recurve, parallel shaft POC, Zwickey 'Eskimo' 2 blade

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •